Shroyer v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.
This text of 226 S.W. 140 (Shroyer v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We approve the holding of the Commission of Appeals on the questions discussed in its original opinion. We likewise adhere to our judgment reversing the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals. It was improper, however, to affirm the judgment of the District Court, as originally recommended by the Commission of Appeals. In this respect the motion for rehearing is granted, and the case will be remanded to the Court of Civil Appeals for its consideration of the questions presented there by the appellant railway company not determined by our approval of the holding of the Commission of Appeals. A number of those questions are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Civil Appeals. It pretermitted consideration of assignments other than those raising the one question upon which it reversed the judgment for the plaintiff in'the trial court. Our reversal of its holding on that question should not preclude its determination of these other assignments.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 S.W. 140, 111 Tex. 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shroyer-v-chicago-r-i-g-ry-co-tex-1920.