Shropshire v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Shropshire v. State

79 S.W.2d 863, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 720

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shropshire v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Tex. Crim. 587 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 1935·No. No. 17396·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of libel, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $500.

The information seems to be sufficient to charge the offense of which the appellant was convicted. The appellant’s bills of exceptions appearing in the record cannot properly be appraised by this court in view of the fact that the record is before us without a.statement of facts.

No fundamental error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of libel, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $500.

The information seems to be sufficient to charge the offense of which the appellant was convicted. The appellant’s bills of exceptions appearing in the record cannot properly be appraised by this court in view of the fact that the record is before us without a.statement of facts.

No fundamental error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Shropshire v. State, 79 S.W.2d 863, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 720 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

79 S.W.2d 863 (Shropshire v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.