Shropshire v. Salter

119 So. 918, 218 Ala. 707
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 24, 1929
Docket6 Div. 133
StatusPublished

This text of 119 So. 918 (Shropshire v. Salter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shropshire v. Salter, 119 So. 918, 218 Ala. 707 (Ala. 1929).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed by agreement. violation of a known reasonable rule or regulation of the employer, was given a careful consideration in Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. Greer, 216 Ala. 267, 113 So. 271. This is the second appeal. The cause being reversed on first appeal as indicated, on retrial it was submitted to the jury on said issue, and the judgment thereon was against defendant and in favor of the plaintiff. This was on evidence not now before this court. This finding of fact and the additional finding of fact by the court sustains the conclusion of liability given expression in the judgment and order of the court now sought to be reversed. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Writ denied; affirmed.

J’’ and S0MB]ryi:ic,:l:e and BROWN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Greer
113 So. 271 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 So. 918, 218 Ala. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shropshire-v-salter-ala-1929.