Shropshire v. Heard
107 S.E. 892, 27 Ga. App. 256, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 805
Opinion
The plaintiff sued on an alleged express contract, and his proof failed to show such a contract; and having sued on an express contract, he was not entitled to recover on a quantum meruit. The court, therefore did not err in awarding a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shropshire v. Heard, 107 S.E. 892, 27 Ga. App. 256, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 805 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).
107 S.E. 892 (Shropshire v. Heard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bank Building & Equipment Corp. of America v. Georgia State Bank
209 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Willis v. Kemp
204 S.E.2d 486 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Brannen v. Lanier
102 S.E.2d 96 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Walter v. Arp
77 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Abernathy v. Putnam
69 S.E.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Johns v. League, Duvall & Powell Inc.
45 S.E.2d 211 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Blackston v. Durant
15 S.E.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Finley v. Coastal Cheveolet Corp.
13 S.E.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Fuller v. Fuller
152 S.E. 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Graham v. Jones
147 S.E. 902 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co.
111 S.E. 220 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)