Shriner v. Shriner
This text of 230 A.D. 769 (Shriner v. Shriner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendant claims he is unable to meet the requirements of the order directing him to pay alimony and counsel fee. Under the facts presented the Special Term was warranted in finding that defendant should not be relieved of his obligations thereunder. However, the action should be tried at the earliest possible moment so that therein there may be a full and complete investigation of defendant’s financial standing and a fixation of alimony accordingly in the event that judgment be awarded to plaintiff, which is likely, since defendant indicates he will not defend. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, S.cudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shriner-v-shriner-nyappdiv-1930.