Shrimpton v. Anandakrishman
733 N.W.2d 764
This text of 733 N.W.2d 764 (Shrimpton v. Anandakrishman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shrimpton v. Anandakrishman, 733 N.W.2d 764 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Josephine SHRIMPTON a/k/a Josephine Shrimpton, Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Alan Shrimpton, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
K.P. ANANDAKRISHMAN, M.D., a/k/a K.P. Anandakrishnan, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sheridan v. WEST BLOOMFIELD NURSING & CONVALESCENT CENTER, INC.
733 N.W.2d 764 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
733 N.W.2d 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shrimpton-v-anandakrishman-mich-2007.