Shreve v. Shineski
This text of Shreve v. Shineski (Shreve v. Shineski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
GAMBIT CLYDE SHREVE, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. ______________________
2012-7077 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10-3629, Judge Lawrence B. Hagel. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
THOMAS R. BENDER, Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick, Ltd., of Providence, Rhode Island, argued for claimant- appellant. Of counsel was ZACHARY M. STOLZ.
MICHAEL S. MACKO, Trial Attorney, Commercial Liti- gation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent- appellee. With him on the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were MICHAEL J. TIMINSKI, Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and JONATHAN E. TAYLOR, Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 18, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Shreve v. Shineski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shreve-v-shineski-cafc-2013.