Shreve v. Fetter

441 F. App'x 150
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1549
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 441 F. App'x 150 (Shreve v. Fetter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shreve v. Fetter, 441 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kimberly Ann Shreve appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Shreve’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Shreve has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shreve v. Stephenson
E.D. North Carolina, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F. App'x 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shreve-v-fetter-ca4-2011.