ShRee Hall v. Diane Lomax

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 27, 2015·No. 05-15-00898-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 27, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00898-CV

SHREE HALL, Appellant

V.

DIANE LOMAX, Appellee

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-19862

ORDER The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated September 23, 2015, we

informed appellant the court reporter had notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed

because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay

for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification she had

requested the record and had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or had been

found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to

provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the appeal being ordered

submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provided the required

documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s record. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellant’s

brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ShRee Hall v. Diane Lomax, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

ShRee Hall v. Diane Lomax (ShRee Hall v. Diane Lomax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.