ShRee Hall v. Diane Lomax
Opinion
Order entered October 27, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00898-CV
SHREE HALL, Appellant
V.
DIANE LOMAX, Appellee
On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-19862
ORDER The reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated September 23, 2015, we
informed appellant the court reporter had notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed
because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay
for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification she had
requested the record and had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, or had been
found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to
provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the appeal being ordered
submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provided the required
documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of the reporter’s record. Therefore, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record. Appellant’s
brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ShRee Hall v. Diane Lomax (ShRee Hall v. Diane Lomax) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.