Shraeder v. Kern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shraeder v. Kern

261 A.D. 1058, 26 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 1058 (Shraeder v. Kern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shraeder v. Kern, 261 A.D. 1058, 26 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner having been duly certified and appointed, and having completed her probationary period, was not subject to removal except in accordance with the provisions of section 22 of the Civil Service Law. (See Matter of Wolff v. Hodson, 285 N. Y. 197, and Matter of Podell v. Hodson, Id. --, decided by the Court of Appeals March 13, 1941.) We do not now determine whether the alleged misstatement concerning the dates between which she was employed by the board of child welfare afiords a sufficient ground for removal if the applicant is found guilty upon charges made in accordance with the Civil Service Law.

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner having been duly certified and appointed, and having completed her probationary period, was not subject to removal except in accordance with the provisions of section 22 of the Civil Service Law. (See Matter of Wolff v. Hodson, 285 N. Y. 197, and Matter of Podell v. Hodson, Id. --, decided by the Court of Appeals March 13, 1941.) We do not now determine whether the alleged misstatement concerning the dates between which she was employed by the board of child welfare afiords a sufficient ground for removal if the applicant is found guilty upon charges made in accordance with the Civil Service Law.

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 1058, 26 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shraeder-v-kern-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack