Home/Connecticut Superior Court/Shrady v. Derochefort, No. Fa95 032 59 35 S (Apr. 1, 1996)

Shrady v. Derochefort, No. Fa95 032 59 35 S (Apr. 1, 1996)

1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 3515
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedApril 1, 1996
DocketNo. FA95 032 59 35 S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 3515 (Shrady v. Derochefort, No. Fa95 032 59 35 S (Apr. 1, 1996)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shrady v. Derochefort, No. Fa95 032 59 35 S (Apr. 1, 1996), 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 3515 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (ENTRY NO. 102) The plaintiff has satisfied the residency requirement of Connecticut General Statutes § 46b-44 (a) for filing the instant complaint. Therefore the defendant's Motion to Dismiss dated CT Page 3516 January 2, 1996 is filed prematurely.

The Motion to Dismiss (docket entry no. 102) is denied without prejudice.

JOHN W. MORAN, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 46b-44
Connecticut § 46b-44(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 3515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shrady-v-derochefort-no-fa95-032-59-35-s-apr-1-1996-connsuperct-1996.