Shrader v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17534, 1995 WL 311570
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1995
Docket94-1902
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 F.3d 774 (Shrader v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shrader v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc., 54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17534, 1995 WL 311570 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

54 F.3d 774
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James E. SHRADER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INCORPORATED;
Deborah A. Masucci; Leonard J. Amoruso; William A.
Bonilla; Donald L. Bruton; Richard Allen Kaye; George E.
Coleman, Jr; John Doe, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-1902.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.

James E. Shrader, Appellant Pro Se. Kiran H. Mehta, George Carruthers Covington, KENNEDY, COVINGTON, LOBDELL & HICKMAN, Charlotte, NC, for Appellees.

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shrader v. National Ass'n of Sec. Dealers, No. CA-93-473-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pfannenstiel v. Merrill Lynch Pierce
477 F.3d 1155 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas v. Juneau
114 S.W.3d 126 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F.3d 774, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17534, 1995 WL 311570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shrader-v-national-assn-of-securities-dealers-inc-ca4-1995.