Shpresim Haxhaj, on behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj v. Warden of Camp Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Springfield

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedOctober 3, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-05613
StatusUnknown

This text of Shpresim Haxhaj, on behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj v. Warden of Camp Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Springfield (Shpresim Haxhaj, on behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj v. Warden of Camp Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Springfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shpresim Haxhaj, on behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj v. Warden of Camp Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Springfield, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHPRESIM HAXHAJ, on behalf of SHPENDIM HAXHAJ, Petitioner, 24 Civ. 5613 (KPF) -v.- ORDER WARDEN OF CAMP MEDICAL CENTER FOR FEDERAL PRISONERS SPRINGFIELD, Respondent. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: On July 7, 2025, Mr. Shpendim Haxhaj, by and through a family member purporting to hold power of attorney, Mr. Shpresim Haxhaj, filed a “Request for Reinstatement of Petition and Recognition of Power of Attorney” in this action. (Dkt. #8). The very same document was also filed in another action, No. 25 Civ. 5354 (LTS) (KPF). The Court denied this request in a July 9, 2025 Order, which was filed at docket entry 4 in No. 25 Civ. 5354. For the very same reasons why the Court already denied this request as filed in No. 25 Civ. 5354, it denies the request in this action. The Court has enclosed a copy of the July 9, 2025 Order for reference. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 8, and to mail a copy of this Order to Mr. Shpresim Haxhaj’s address of record: 1906 White Plains Road, Bronx, New York, 10462. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 3, 2025 New York, New York

KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge

Enc. Petitioner: Shpresim Haxhaj behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj Respondent: U.S. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABAES CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C §2241

_ Shpresim Haxhaj, affirm the following: Request for Reinstatement of Petition and Recognition of Power of Attorney Dear Judge Laura Taylor Swain, I respectfully request that the Court reinstate my petition on behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj, dated July 19, 2024, on the grounds that I never consented to the petition being transferred to Missouri. I also respectfully ask this Court to investigate the conduct of Hudson County officials, particularly regarding whether the use of force against my brother was justified. 1 ask that this justification be supported with clear evidence and documentation. I personally witnessed my brother on May 22, 2025, during his sentencing hearing. Everything described in my July 19, 2024 petition explains the origin and progression of his current deteriorated condition. My brother has been reduced to a state resembling that of a prisoner in a World War II refugee camp visibly malnourished, neglected, and hopeless. This description may seem strong, but as an Albanian, 1 struggle to find any other term to conveywhatIsaw. | Unfortunately, public perception of Albanians has been negatively shaped by Hollywood portrayals, For instance, the movie Taken, starring Liam Neeson, and Deep Cover, available on Amazon Prime, depict Albanians as inherently violent criminals. In Deep Cover, the backgrounds of other criminal characters are vague, while the Albanian characters are given heavy, stereotyped emphasis. I find this portrayal deeply suspicious, and I have heard rumors that some of this anti-Albanian stigina is propagated by Serbian actors in Hollywood. This pattern of propaganda is not unprecedented similar tactics were used by Soviet operatives during the Reagan era to destabilize American perceptions. This matters because Albanians have a proud history of protecting the vulnerable, including sheltering Jewish refugees during World War II when many other European countries closed their borders. Albanians hold sacred oaths, including

. 4 nf4

Besa, the promise of protection. To attack the dignity of Albanians such as my brother is to deny the contributions that Albanian-Americans have made to the United States, from Mira Murati, co-founder of ChatGPT, to Dua Lipa, a globally recognizedartist. I know my brother Shpendim Haxhaj to be a brave, God-fearing man who has always been conscious of his appearance and dignity in front of others. I can only imagine the psychological torment he must be experiencing if he is aware of how severely he been degraded, ° Constitutional Concern: Power of Attorney and Pro Se Rights One of the most pressing constitutional issues here is the validity and recognition of the Power of Attorney (POA)that my brother executed on October 12, 2023, assigning me authority. Unfortunately, multiple courts and agencies have deflected or ignored this instrument, leading to an ongoing dispute 1 now ask this Court to resolve. This POA specifically authorizes me to exercise his pro se rights on his behalf, not to act as his attorney, but to stand in his place because he is incapable of doing so himself. I firmly believe that denying me the ability to enforce his rights exactly as he would constitutes a direct violation of his pro se rights. On August 15, 2024, the Honorable Judge Stephen R. Bough correctly articulated the test for “next friend” standing: “An adequate explanation such as inaccessibility, mental incompetence, or other disability why the real party in interest cannot appear on his own behalf to prosecute the action.” In response: My brother was deemed incompetent around this time, and that should satisfy this requirement for that moment. Regarding the general federal rule under 28 U.S.C. § 1654, I understand that a power of attorney does not permit someone to act as legal counsel. However, I am not acting as his lawyer. The POA specifically confers his pro se rights to me, allowing me to act as him, not for him. Denying the effectiveness of that delegation is not just a technical rejection it amounts to a denial of his fundamental constitutional right to control his own litigation strategy, particularly as a pro se litigant who cannot speak for himself.

To deny that right is to say that only those with a law license may represent the interests of the voiceless, a dangerous proposition that undermines the spirit of pro se jurisprudence.

Relief Humbly Requested: 1. Reinstate the petition dated July 19, 2024, filed on behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj. 2. Recognize the Power of Attorney executed by Shpendim Haxhaj on October 12, . 2023, authorizing me to act in his stead. 3. Postpone the sentencing, which currently falls on Election Day. It is deeply

inappropriate and emotionally damaging to ask our family to participate in civic duties like voting while enduring such a traumatic proceeding. A. Permit me to sit beside my brother during court proceedings, to ensure that his rights are protected and that he can communicate effectively through me. 5, Transfer Shpendim Haxhaj to Springfield Medical Center (MDC) in Missouri so he may be re-evaluated by the same doctor who originally found him incompetent. This would ensure continuity of care, consistency in evaluation, and fairness, particularly since my family and 1 accepted the original determination based on his observable condition at that time. In contrast, the current finding of competency is not acceptable to us, given his visibly deteriorated state. Additionally, the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) where he is currently held lacks the specialized psychiatric resources and forensic evaluation infrastructure that Springfield, Missouri possesses. Therefore, I respectfully request that proceedings be halted and he be transferred back to Springfield, and that the original evaluating physician be allowed to make a new, independent competency determination. 6. Please Seal this petition due to his medical state being mentioned. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. Arkansas
495 U.S. 149 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Warrick v. General Electric Co.
70 F.3d 736 (Second Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shpresim Haxhaj, on behalf of Shpendim Haxhaj v. Warden of Camp Medical Center for Federal Prisoners Springfield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shpresim-haxhaj-on-behalf-of-shpendim-haxhaj-v-warden-of-camp-medical-nysd-2025.