Shows v. Freedlander, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Shows v. Freedlander, Inc.

523 So. 2d 376, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 150, 1988 WL 33227

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedApril 1, 1988

Docket86-798

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 523 So. 2d 376 (Shows v. Freedlander, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shows v. Freedlander, Inc., 523 So. 2d 376, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 150, 1988 WL 33227 (Ala. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2)(D), A.R.App.P., we find that the motion is due to be granted, the appellant having substantially failed to comply with Rule 28(a), A.R.App.P. The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Eady v. Stewart Dredging & Construction Co., 463 So.2d 156 (Ala.1985); Stover v. Alabama Farm Bureau Ins. Co., 467 So.2d 251 (Ala.1985).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2)(D), A.R.App.P., we find that the motion is due to be granted, the appellant having substantially failed to comply with Rule 28(a), A.R.App.P. The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Eady v. Stewart Dredging & Construction Co., 463 So.2d 156 (Ala.1985); Stover v. Alabama Farm Bureau Ins. Co., 467 So.2d 251 (Ala.1985).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 So. 2d 376, 1988 Ala. LEXIS 150, 1988 WL 33227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shows-v-freedlander-inc-ala-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack