Showers v. Stimson
This text of 272 A.D.2d 1037 (Showers v. Stimson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur. (Appeal from fora orders (1) denying plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite, (2) dismissing plaintiff’s complaint as to defendant City of Corning, (3) dismissing the complaint as to defendant. Sells as Commissioner [Superintendent] of Public Works and (4) dismissing the complaint as to defendant Sells, individually.) Present — Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 A.D.2d 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/showers-v-stimson-nyappdiv-1947.