Showers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Showers v. State

100 So. 569, 20 Ala. App. 20, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 125

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 3, 1924

Docket6 Div. 392.

StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 569 (Showers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Showers v. State, 100 So. 569, 20 Ala. App. 20, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 125 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There was demurrer to the indictment on the ground that there was no allegation that the party assaulted was a woman. The indictment does not follow in hsec verba (Code, § 7161 [15.1), but we are of the opinion that considered in connection with Code 1907, §§ 7134 and 7135, the allegation that the party assaulted was a woman is sufficiently made.

There is no bill of exceptions, and, no error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

There was demurrer to the indictment on the ground that there was no allegation that the party assaulted was a woman. The indictment does not follow in hsec verba (Code, § 7161 [15.1), but we are of the opinion that considered in connection with Code 1907, §§ 7134 and 7135, the allegation that the party assaulted was a woman is sufficiently made.

There is no bill of exceptions, and, no error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 So. 569, 20 Ala. App. 20, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/showers-v-state-alactapp-1924.