Showers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Showers v. State

100 So. 569, 20 Ala. App. 20, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 125

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 3, 1924·No. 6 Div. 392.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There was demurrer to the indictment on the ground that there was no allegation that the party assaulted was a woman. The indictment does not follow in hsec verba (Code, § 7161 [15.1), but we are of the opinion that considered in connection with Code 1907, §§ 7134 and 7135, the allegation that the party assaulted was a woman is sufficiently made.

There is no bill of exceptions, and, no error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

There was demurrer to the indictment on the ground that there was no allegation that the party assaulted was a woman. The indictment does not follow in hsec verba (Code, § 7161 [15.1), but we are of the opinion that considered in connection with Code 1907, §§ 7134 and 7135, the allegation that the party assaulted was a woman is sufficiently made.

There is no bill of exceptions, and, no error appearing in the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Showers v. State, 100 So. 569, 20 Ala. App. 20, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 125 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

100 So. 569 (Showers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.