Showell v. State
696 So. 2d 1349, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8430, 1997 WL 410474
This text of 696 So. 2d 1349 (Showell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Showell v. State, 696 So. 2d 1349, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8430, 1997 WL 410474 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
We affirm the defendant’s judgments of conviction for sale or delivery of cocaine, and possession of cocaine. However, upon the State’s proper confession of error, we vacate the sentence, in which the trial court failed to distinguish between the sentence for count I and the sentence for count II, and remand for resentencing.
[1350]*1350Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
696 So. 2d 1349, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8430, 1997 WL 410474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/showell-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.