Showell, Fryer & Co. v. Barr
86 A. 786, 239 Pa. 287, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 555
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 3, 1913
DocketAppeal, No. 141
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 86 A. 786 (Showell, Fryer & Co. v. Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Showell, Fryer & Co. v. Barr, 86 A. 786, 239 Pa. 287, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 555 (Pa. 1913).
Opinion
This action was on a promissory note given in payment for the stock of a corporation. The defendant’s contention at the trial, that there could be.no recovery on the note because it was negotiated after maturity calls for no discussion. Every defense available against the payee was admitted and submitted to the jury with full and accurate instructions.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Litcher v. North City Trust Co.
169 A. 409 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
86 A. 786, 239 Pa. 287, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/showell-fryer-co-v-barr-pa-1913.