Shovlin v. Ball

786 A.2d 171
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 6, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 786 A.2d 171 (Shovlin v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shovlin v. Ball, 786 A.2d 171 (Pa. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issue:

Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying Petitioner’s motion to amend the pleadings after the statute of limitations had expired in order to correct the suffixes of the defendants’ names?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 A.2d 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shovlin-v-ball-pa-2001.