SHOULTS v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

SHOULTS v. State

329 S.W.3d 755, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 37, 2011 WL 135014

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 18, 2011·No. ED 94595·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michelle Shoults appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michelle Shoults appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

SHOULTS v. State, 329 S.W.3d 755, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 37, 2011 WL 135014 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

329 S.W.3d 755 (SHOULTS v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.