SHOULDIS v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

SHOULDIS v. State

38 So. 3d 763, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 265, 2009 WL 3805801

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 13, 2009·No. 1080186·Published

Opinion

BOLIN, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

*764 LYONS, WOODALL, STUART, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur. COBB, C.J., recuses herself.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BOLIN, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

*764 LYONS, WOODALL, STUART, and MURDOCK, JJ., concur. COBB, C.J., recuses herself.

SHOULDIS v. State, 38 So. 3d 763, 2009 Ala. LEXIS 265, 2009 WL 3805801 (Ala. 2009).

Pincite

38 So. 3d 763 (SHOULDIS v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related