Shoub v. Dunbar

100 A. 829, 256 Pa. 311, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 605
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 15, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 176·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The agreement of appellants was to convey to appellee a lot of 'ground “free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.” Although Federal Lane has never' been opened through the land owned by pláintiffs, it was none the less a public highway: Commonwealth v. McNaugher et al., 131 Pa. 55. That portion of it was vacated by an.ordinance of the City of Pittsburgh, passed June 16, 1910, [312]*312in pursuance of the Act of March 21, 1905, P. L. 46; but as yet the damages and benefits arising from said vacation have not been ascertained. As benefits may be assessed against the lot which appellants agreed to convey to appellee clear of “all liens and encumbrances,” judgment was properly entered for the defendant on the case stated, and it is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shoub v. Dunbar, 100 A. 829, 256 Pa. 311, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 605 (Pa. 1917).

100 A. 829 (Shoub v. Dunbar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shefts v. Security Title & Guaranty Co.
55 Pa. D. & C.2d 616 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Moore v. Beattie
5 Pa. D. & C.2d 739 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
Ritter v. Hill
127 A. 455 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)