Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedApril 3, 2023
Docket2:17-cv-01387
StatusUnknown

This text of Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc (Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Opinion

1 The Honorable John C. Coughenour

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 In re Zillow Group, Inc. Securities Litigation No. 2:17-cv-1387-JCC 7 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 8 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 9 SETTLEMENT 10

12 WHEREAS, Class Representatives Johanna Choy, Raymond Harris, and Jo Ann Offutt 13 (“Class Representatives”), individually and on behalf of the Class, and Defendants Zillow Group, 14 Inc. (“Zillow” or the “Company”), Spencer M. Rascoff, and Kathleen Philips (“Defendants” and 15 together with Class Representatives, the “Parties”), have entered into the Stipulation of Settlement, 16 dated March 31, 2023 (“Stipulation”), which is subject to review under Rule 23 of the Federal 17 Rules of Civil Procedure and which, together with the exhibits annexed thereto, sets forth the terms 18 and conditions for the proposed settlement of the class action pending before the Court entitled In 19 re Zillow Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:17-cv-01387 (W.D. Wash.) (“Action”); and 20 WHEREAS, the Court has read and considered the Stipulation and the exhibits thereto and 21 submissions made relating thereto, and 22 WHEREAS, the Court finds that substantial and sufficient grounds exist for entering this 23 Order; and 24 WHEREAS, the Parties consent to the entry of this Order; 25 26 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this 3rd day of April, 2023, that: 1 1. All capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings as set forth and defined 2 in the Stipulation. 3 2. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation and its exhibits and finds that (a) the 4 Stipulation resulted from good faith, arm’s-length negotiations, and (b) the Stipulation is 5 sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Class Members to warrant providing notice of the 6 Settlement to Class Members and holding a Settlement Hearing. 7 3. The Court hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement, subject to further 8 consideration at a hearing (“Settlement Hearing”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9 23(e), which is hereby scheduled to be held before the Court on August 8, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. for 10 the following purposes: 11 (a) to determine finally whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and 12 adequate, and should be approved by the Court; 13 (b) to determine finally whether the Final Judgment, substantially in the form 14 of Exhibit B to the Stipulation, should be entered, dismissing the Action on the merits and with 15 prejudice, and to determine whether the release by the Releasing Parties of the Released Claims against the Released Parties, as set forth in the Stipulation, should be ordered, along with a 16 permanent injunction barring efforts to prosecute or attempt to prosecute any Released Claims 17 extinguished by the release against any of the Released Parties, as also set forth in the Stipulation; 18 (c) to determine finally whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the 19 distribution of the Net Settlement Fund is fair and reasonable and should be approved by the Court; 20 (d) to consider the application of Class Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees 21 and expenses and for an award to Class Representatives (“Fee and Expense Application”); 22 (e) to consider Class Members’ objections to the Settlement, if any, whether 23 submitted previously in writing or presented orally at the Settlement Hearing by Class Members 24 (or by counsel on their behalf); and 25 (f) to rule upon such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate. 26 1 4. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing to a later date and 2 to approve the Settlement with or without modification and with or without further notice other 3 than entry of an Order on the Court’s docket. The Court may decide to hold the Settlement Hearing 4 telephonically or by other virtual means without further notice. The Court further reserves the right 5 to enter its Final Judgment approving the Settlement and dismissing the Action, on the merits and 6 with prejudice, regardless of whether it has approved the Plan of Allocation or the Fee and Expense 7 Application. 8 5. The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement with such modifications as 9 may be agreed upon or consented to by the Parties and without further notice to the Class where 10 to do so would not impair Class Members’ rights in a manner inconsistent with Rule 23 of the 11 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, other applicable rules or regulations, or due process of law. 12 6. The Court approves the form, substance, and requirements of the (a) Long Notice, 13 (b) Proof of Claim, (c) Summary Notice, and (d) Postcard Notice, all of which are exhibits to the 14 Stipulation. 15 7. Class Counsel, on behalf of Class Representatives, has the authority to enter into the Settlement on behalf of the Class and has the authority to act on behalf of the Class with respect 16 to all acts or consents required by or that may be given pursuant to the Stipulation or such other 17 acts that are reasonably necessary to consummate the Settlement. 18 8. Strategic Claims Services is appointed and approved as the Claims Administrator 19 to supervise and administer the notice procedure as well as the processing of claims. 20 9. The Escrow Agent may, at any time after entry of this Order and without further 21 approval from Defendants or the Court, disburse at the direction of Class Counsel up to $750,000 22 from the Settlement Fund prior to the Effective Date to pay reasonable Administrative Costs. After 23 the Effective Date, up to an additional $750,000 may be transferred from the Settlement Fund to 24 pay for any reasonable and necessary Administrative Costs without further order of the Court. 25 10. Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, Class Counsel, through the Claims 26 Administrator, shall either: (a) email links to the location of the Long Notice and Proof of Claim, 1 substantially in the form annexed to the Stipulation as Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit A-2, to Class 2 Members for whom the Claims Administrator is able to obtain email addresses; or (b) if no 3 electronic mail address can be obtained, cause the Postcard Notice, substantially in the form 4 annexed to the Stipulation as Exhibit A-4, to be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to Class 5 Members who can be identified with reasonable effort by Class Counsel, through the Claims 6 Administrator. 7 11. Class Counsel, through the Claims Administrator, shall make all reasonable efforts 8 to give notice to nominees or custodians who held Zillow securities during the Class Period as 9 record owners but not as beneficial owners. Such nominees or custodians shall, within ten (10) 10 days of receipt of the notice, either: (i) request copies of the Postcard Notice sufficient to send the 11 Postcard Notice to all beneficial owners for whom they are nominee or custodian, and within ten 12 (10) days after receipt thereof send copies to such beneficial owners; (ii) request links to the 13 location of the Long Notice and Proof of Claim and email the links to each beneficial owner for 14 whom they are nominee or custodian within ten (10) days after receipt thereof; or (iii) provide the 15 Claims Administrator with lists of the names, last known addresses and email addresses (to the extent known) of such beneficial owners, in which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly 16 deliver the Postcard Notice to such beneficial owners. If the Claims Administrator receives an 17 email address, it will send a link to the location of the Long Notice and Proof of Claim 18 electronically.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherri B. Simpson v. Trump University, LLC
881 F.3d 1111 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Denney v. Deutsche Bank AG
443 F.3d 253 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shotwell-v-zillow-group-inc-wawd-2023.