Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided April 3, 2023·No. 2:17-cv-01387·Unknown

Opinion

The Honorable John C. Coughenour

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON In re Zillow Group, Inc. Securities Litigation No. 2:17-cv-1387-JCC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

WHEREAS, Class Representatives Johanna Choy, Raymond Harris, and Jo Ann Offutt (“Class Representatives”), individually and on behalf of the Class, and Defendants Zillow Group, Inc. (“Zillow” or the “Company”), Spencer M. Rascoff, and Kathleen Philips (“Defendants” and together with Class Representatives, the “Parties”), have entered into the Stipulation of Settlement, dated March 31, 2023 (“Stipulation”), which is subject to review under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and which, together with the exhibits annexed thereto, sets forth the terms and conditions for the proposed settlement of the class action pending before the Court entitled In re Zillow Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:17-cv-01387 (W.D. Wash.) (“Action”); and WHEREAS, the Court has read and considered the Stipulation and the exhibits thereto and submissions made relating thereto, and WHEREAS, the Court finds that substantial and sufficient grounds exist for entering this Order; and WHEREAS, the Parties consent to the entry of this Order; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, this 3rd day of April, 2023, that: 1. All capitalized terms used herein have the same meanings as set forth and defined in the Stipulation. 2. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation and its exhibits and finds that (a) the Stipulation resulted from good faith, arm’s-length negotiations, and (b) the Stipulation is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Class Members to warrant providing notice of the Settlement to Class Members and holding a Settlement Hearing. 3. The Court hereby preliminarily approves the Settlement, subject to further consideration at a hearing (“Settlement Hearing”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), which is hereby scheduled to be held before the Court on August 8, 2023, at 9:00 a.m. for the following purposes: (a) to determine finally whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and should be approved by the Court; (b) to determine finally whether the Final Judgment, substantially in the form of Exhibit B to the Stipulation, should be entered, dismissing the Action on the merits and with prejudice, and to determine whether the release by the Releasing Parties of the Released Claims against the Released Parties, as set forth in the Stipulation, should be ordered, along with a permanent injunction barring efforts to prosecute or attempt to prosecute any Released Claims extinguished by the release against any of the Released Parties, as also set forth in the Stipulation; (c) to determine finally whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund is fair and reasonable and should be approved by the Court; (d) to consider the application of Class Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses and for an award to Class Representatives (“Fee and Expense Application”); (e) to consider Class Members’ objections to the Settlement, if any, whether submitted previously in writing or presented orally at the Settlement Hearing by Class Members (or by counsel on their behalf); and (f) to rule upon such other matters as the Court may deem appropriate. 4. The Court reserves the right to adjourn the Settlement Hearing to a later date and to approve the Settlement with or without modification and with or without further notice other than entry of an Order on the Court’s docket. The Court may decide to hold the Settlement Hearing telephonically or by other virtual means without further notice. The Court further reserves the right to enter its Final Judgment approving the Settlement and dismissing the Action, on the merits and with prejudice, regardless of whether it has approved the Plan of Allocation or the Fee and Expense Application. 5. The Court reserves the right to approve the Settlement with such modifications as may be agreed upon or consented to by the Parties and without further notice to the Class where to do so would not impair Class Members’ rights in a manner inconsistent with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, other applicable rules or regulations, or due process of law. 6. The Court approves the form, substance, and requirements of the (a) Long Notice, (b) Proof of Claim, (c) Summary Notice, and (d) Postcard Notice, all of which are exhibits to the Stipulation. 7. Class Counsel, on behalf of Class Representatives, has the authority to enter into the Settlement on behalf of the Class and has the authority to act on behalf of the Class with respect to all acts or consents required by or that may be given pursuant to the Stipulation or such other acts that are reasonably necessary to consummate the Settlement. 8. Strategic Claims Services is appointed and approved as the Claims Administrator to supervise and administer the notice procedure as well as the processing of claims. 9. The Escrow Agent may, at any time after entry of this Order and without further approval from Defendants or the Court, disburse at the direction of Class Counsel up to $750,000 from the Settlement Fund prior to the Effective Date to pay reasonable Administrative Costs. After the Effective Date, up to an additional $750,000 may be transferred from the Settlement Fund to pay for any reasonable and necessary Administrative Costs without further order of the Court. 10. Within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order, Class Counsel, through the Claims Administrator, shall either: (a) email links to the location of the Long Notice and Proof of Claim, substantially in the form annexed to the Stipulation as Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit A-2, to Class Members for whom the Claims Administrator is able to obtain email addresses; or (b) if no electronic mail address can be obtained, cause the Postcard Notice, substantially in the form annexed to the Stipulation as Exhibit A-4, to be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to Class Members who can be identified with reasonable effort by Class Counsel, through the Claims Administrator. 11. Class Counsel, through the Claims Administrator, shall make all reasonable efforts to give notice to nominees or custodians who held Zillow securities during the Class Period as record owners but not as beneficial owners. Such nominees or custodians shall, within ten (10) days of receipt of the notice, either: (i) request copies of the Postcard Notice sufficient to send the Postcard Notice to all beneficial owners for whom they are nominee or custodian, and within ten (10) days after receipt thereof send copies to such beneficial owners; (ii) request links to the location of the Long Notice and Proof of Claim and email the links to each beneficial owner for whom they are nominee or custodian within ten (10) days after receipt thereof; or (iii) provide the Claims Administrator with lists of the names, last known addresses and email addresses (to the extent known) of such beneficial owners, in which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly deliver the Postcard Notice to such beneficial owners. If the Claims Administrator receives an email address, it will send a link to the location of the Long Notice and Proof of Claim electronically. Nominees or custodians who elect to email links to the Long Notice and Proof of Claim or send the Postcard Notice to their ben

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc (Shotwell v. Zillow Group, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherri B. Simpson v. Trump University, LLC
881 F.3d 1111 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Denney v. Deutsche Bank AG
443 F.3d 253 (Second Circuit, 2006)