Shotwell v. State

120 S.W.2d 97, 135 Tex. Crim. 366, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 722
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 8, 1938
DocketNo. 19829.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 S.W.2d 97 (Shotwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shotwell v. State, 120 S.W.2d 97, 135 Tex. Crim. 366, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 722 (Tex. 1938).

Opinions

Morrow, Presiding Judge.

Theft of an automobile is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The record is before this Court without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error has been perceived or pointed out justifying a reversal of the conviction.

*367 The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Insurance Co. of North America v. Lemon
477 S.W.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 S.W.2d 97, 135 Tex. Crim. 366, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shotwell-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.