Shotwell v. Shotwell

96 A. 398, 85 N.J. Eq. 594, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 401
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Stevenson.

For a-ffM-mance—Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, White, Terhune, I-Ieepeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shotwell v. Shotwell, 96 A. 398, 85 N.J. Eq. 594, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 401 (N.J. 1916).

96 A. 398 (Shotwell v. Shotwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Raynolds
27 A.2d 226 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1942)