Shotland v. Mulligan

121 N.Y.S. 613
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 10, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the tenant appellant from a final order entered in a Municipal Court in favor of the landlord, in a! summary proceeding to recover possession of premises. The defendant was in possession under a written lease, which covenanted to “install a steam-heating system and hot-water supply, and to furnish [614]*614steam heat as the same may be needed and hot water the year round.” The answer is a general denial, and the defendant also seeks to counterclaim damages alleged to have been sustained by defendant by reason of plaintiff’s failure to fulfill this covenant.

The landlord failed to prove personal service, or the giving of the statutory three days’ notice, as required by section 3231 of the Code of Civil Procedure. “This being a summary proceeding, it is necessary that the provisions of the statute should be strictly followed.” Beach v. McGovern, 41 App. Div. 381, 58 N. Y. Supp. 493. See, also, Bloom v. Huyck, 71 Hun, 252, 25 N. Y. Supp. 7.

Final order reversed, with costs, and proceedings dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shotland v. Mulligan, 121 N.Y.S. 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

121 N.Y.S. 613 (Shotland v. Mulligan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shotland v. Mulligan
126 N.Y.S. 1146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)