Shotkin v. Gleeson

Third Circuit

Shotkin v. Gleeson

125 F.2d 708, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4461

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 1942

DocketNo. 7881

StatusPublished

This text of 125 F.2d 708 (Shotkin v. Gleeson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shotkin v. Gleeson, 125 F.2d 708, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4461 (3d Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the request of the plaintiff and with the consent of the defendants this case was submitted to the court without oral argument on either side. After consideration of the record and of the plaintiff’s brief we are satisfied that the plaintiff’s contentions are without merit and that the district court committed no error in dismissing the complaint. Accordingly the decree of the ■ district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

At the request of the plaintiff and with the consent of the defendants this case was submitted to the court without oral argument on either side. After consideration of the record and of the plaintiff’s brief we are satisfied that the plaintiff’s contentions are without merit and that the district court committed no error in dismissing the complaint. Accordingly the decree of the ■ district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 F.2d 708, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shotkin-v-gleeson-ca3-1942.