Shoten v. United States

4 Cust. Ct. 801, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4079
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shoten v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Cust. Ct. 45
United States Customs Court·Decided April 17, 1940·No. No. 4874; Entry Nos. 1335, 1222, A-201, 930, 2293·Published

Opinion

Brown, Judge:

These appeals to reappraisement have been stipulated and submitted for decision by counsel for the parties hereto.

In harmony with the stipulation, I find the foreign value, as such value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the values involved herein, the invoiced descriptions of which are marked A on the invoices and initialed by the respective examiners, and that such values are the unit invoiced values, plus packing and cases as invoiced.

As to all other merchandise involved, the appeals having been abandoned, I find the dutiable values to be the values returned by the appraiser. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shoten v. United States, 4 Cust. Ct. 801, 1940 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4079 (cusc 1940).

4 Cust. Ct. 801 (Shoten v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.