Shoso Nii v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Allen Property Custodian

181 F.2d 1013, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1950
Docket12212
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 181 F.2d 1013 (Shoso Nii v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Allen Property Custodian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shoso Nii v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Allen Property Custodian, 181 F.2d 1013, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746 (9th Cir. 1950).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition of appellee for a rehearing is. denied.

Our decision of March 6, 1950, is ordered set aside. The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court for consideration of the issue respecting the transfer of the property, vested by the appellee, to Nii by his father on his departure for Japan or on his death, and the issue respecting the claimed right to the income therefrom upon the depositions and other evidence now-adduced and other evidence which may be procured and hereafter adduced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FAR Liquidating Corporation v. Brownell
130 F. Supp. 691 (D. Delaware, 1955)
Harold Van Doren v. Omaha Standard
181 F.2d 1013 (Eighth Circuit, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 F.2d 1013, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shoso-nii-v-j-howard-mcgrath-attorney-general-as-successor-to-the-allen-ca9-1950.