Shoso Nii v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Allen Property Custodian

181 F.2d 1013, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 15, 1950·No. 12212·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition of appellee for a rehearing is. denied.

Our decision of March 6, 1950, is ordered set aside. The judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court for consideration of the issue respecting the transfer of the property, vested by the appellee, to Nii by his father on his departure for Japan or on his death, and the issue respecting the claimed right to the income therefrom upon the depositions and other evidence now-adduced and other evidence which may be procured and hereafter adduced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shoso Nii v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Allen Property Custodian, 181 F.2d 1013, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2746 (9th Cir. 1950).

181 F.2d 1013 (Shoso Nii v. J. Howard McGrath Attorney General, as Successor to the Allen Property Custodian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

FAR Liquidating Corporation v. Brownell
130 F. Supp. 691 (D. Delaware, 1955)
Harold Van Doren v. Omaha Standard
181 F.2d 1013 (Eighth Circuit, 1950)