Shortz v. City of Tuskegee
176 L. Ed. 2d 217, 130 S. Ct. 1742, 559 U.S. 994, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2287, 78 U.S.L.W. 3521
This text of 176 L. Ed. 2d 217 (Shortz v. City of Tuskegee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Shortz v. City of Tuskegee, 176 L. Ed. 2d 217, 130 S. Ct. 1742, 559 U.S. 994, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2287, 78 U.S.L.W. 3521 (U.S. 2010).
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
Same case below, 352 Fed. Appx. 355.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James H. Shortz v. City of Tuskegee
352 F. App'x 355 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 L. Ed. 2d 217, 130 S. Ct. 1742, 559 U.S. 994, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2287, 78 U.S.L.W. 3521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shortz-v-city-of-tuskegee-scotus-2010.