Shortt v. State

509 So. 2d 1136, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1407, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8583
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 4, 1987
DocketNo. 86-684
StatusPublished

This text of 509 So. 2d 1136 (Shortt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shortt v. State, 509 So. 2d 1136, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1407, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8583 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We elect to treat petitioner’s Rule 3.850 motion for a belated appeal as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. We previously referred the petition to the trial judge for an evidentiary hearing, and based on the findings of the trial judge that Shortt was denied effective assistance of counsel in perfecting his appeal, we hereby grant petitioner’s application for a belated appeal of his criminal conviction and sentence. If appropriate, the trial court shall appoint appellate counsel to represent petitioner and conduct his appeal. The Notice of Appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of the issuance of this Writ.

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS GRANTED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
509 So. 2d 1136, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1407, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shortt-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.