Shorter v. State

315 S.E.2d 35, 169 Ga. App. 804, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2822
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 13, 1984
Docket67694
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 315 S.E.2d 35 (Shorter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shorter v. State, 315 S.E.2d 35, 169 Ga. App. 804, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2822 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

In this appeal from his conviction of entering a motor vehicle with intent to commit a theft, the defendant’s sole contention is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

The victim positively identified the defendant; and the defendant’s car, which was used to transport the property stolen from the victim’s vehicle, was also identified. Held:

Applying the standard prescribed in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), we find the evidence sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

[805]*805Decided February 13, 1984. Michael H. Lane, for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, H. Allen Moye, A. Thomas Jones, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lanham v. State
362 S.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 S.E.2d 35, 169 Ga. App. 804, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shorter-v-state-gactapp-1984.