Shorter v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Shorter v. State

106 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 692

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 8, 1925

Docket6 Div. 748.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 923 (Shorter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shorter v. State, 106 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 692 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

Appellant, defendant in the court below, was tried and convicted for the offense of grand larceny. The specific charge was that he feloniously took and carried away from the person of William McCredy two $10 bills and two $1 bills, lawful currency of the United States of America, the property of William McCredy. The court fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary from two to three years. Judgment of conviction was accordingly entered, from which he appealed. The appeal is rested upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is free *693 ■from error, the judgment of conviction appealed from in the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

Appellant, defendant in the court below, was tried and convicted for the offense of grand larceny. The specific charge was that he feloniously took and carried away from the person of William McCredy two $10 bills and two $1 bills, lawful currency of the United States of America, the property of William McCredy. The court fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary from two to three years. Judgment of conviction was accordingly entered, from which he appealed. The appeal is rested upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. As the record is free *693 ■from error, the judgment of conviction appealed from in the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shorter-v-state-alactapp-1925.