Shortau v. Buresch

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Shortau v. Buresch

65 A.2d 634, 3 N.J. Super. 139, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 894

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedApril 25, 1949

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 A.2d 634 (Shortau v. Buresch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shortau v. Buresch, 65 A.2d 634, 3 N.J. Super. 139, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 894 (N.J. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

This is the defendant's appeal from a judgment for $150 rendered against him in the Passaic District Court prior to September 15, 1948. The appendix contains the state of demand, notice of appeal, an order allowing deposit in lieu of appeal bond and the comments of the trial court at the conclusion of the case and nothing more. The questions sought to be raised are failure to nonsuit and direct a verdict for defendant and alleged errors in the admission of evidence. Rule 1:3-2(f) requires appellant to furnish an appendix which "shall contain such parts of the record material to the questions presented as the appellant desires the court to read." The appendix fails to meet the requirement of the rule.

On the court's motion without oral argument on the merits, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is the defendant's appeal from a judgment for $150 rendered against him in the Passaic District Court prior to September 15, 1948. The appendix contains the state of demand, notice of appeal, an order allowing deposit in lieu of appeal bond and the comments of the trial court at the conclusion of the case and nothing more. The questions sought to be raised are failure to nonsuit and direct a verdict for defendant and alleged errors in the admission of evidence. Rule 1:3-2(f) requires appellant to furnish an appendix which "shall contain such parts of the record material to the questions presented as the appellant desires the court to read." The appendix fails to meet the requirement of the rule.

On the court's motion without oral argument on the merits, the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.2d 634, 3 N.J. Super. 139, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shortau-v-buresch-njsuperctappdiv-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack