Shortau v. Buresch

65 A.2d 634, 3 N.J. Super. 139, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 894
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided April 25, 1949·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

This is the defendant's appeal from a judgment for $150 rendered against him in the Passaic District Court prior to September 15, 1948. The appendix contains the state of demand, notice of appeal, an order allowing deposit in lieu of appeal bond and the comments of the trial court at the conclusion of the case and nothing more. The questions sought to be raised are failure to nonsuit and direct a verdict for defendant and alleged errors in the admission of evidence. Rule 1:3-2(f) requires appellant to furnish an appendix which "shall contain such parts of the record material to the questions presented as the appellant desires the court to read." The appendix fails to meet the requirement of the rule.

On the court's motion without oral argument on the merits, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shortau v. Buresch, 65 A.2d 634, 3 N.J. Super. 139, 1949 N.J. Super. LEXIS 894 (N.J. Ct. App. 1949).

65 A.2d 634 (Shortau v. Buresch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Highway Commissioner v. Union Paving Co.
109 A.2d 424 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Fitzgerald v. Finnegan
71 A.2d 377 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)