Short v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTH. FOR REGIONAL TRANS.
728 N.W.2d 425, 477 Mich. 1055
This text of 728 N.W.2d 425 (Short v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTH. FOR REGIONAL TRANS.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Short v. SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTH. FOR REGIONAL TRANS., 728 N.W.2d 425, 477 Mich. 1055 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Tanesha SHORT, n/k/a Tanesha Parker, as Next Friend for Iesha Allen, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION, a/k/a SMART, and Joseph Jaumaal Brown, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
728 N.W.2d 425, 477 Mich. 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/short-v-suburban-mobility-auth-for-regional-trans-mich-2007.