Short v. State

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 6, 2004
Docket2004-MO-070
StatusUnpublished

This text of Short v. State (Short v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Short v. State, (S.C. 2004).

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court


Jimmy Short, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.


Appeal from Dillon County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge


ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI


Memorandum Opinion No. 2004-MO-070
Submitted October 20, 2004 – Filed December 6, 2004


AFFIRMED


Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of  S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for petitioner.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Allen Bullard, and Assistant Attorney General William Bryan Dukes, of Columbia, for respondent.


PER CURIAM:  Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority:  Thompson v. State, 357 S.C. 192, 593 S.E.2d 139 (2004) (victim’s name does not affect subject matter jurisdiction). 

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. State
593 S.E.2d 139 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Short v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/short-v-state-sc-2004.