Short v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Short v. State

620 So. 2d 1305, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620, 1993 WL 267526

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 20, 1993·No. No. 92-2189·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is sufficient evidence on the record upon which the trier of fact could base its verdict. See Rodriguez v. State, 558 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Moreover, the trial court properly classified the defendant’s conviction as a first degree felony and correctly sentenced him as a habitual violent felony offender to a life term. See Miller v. State, 460 So.2d 373 (Fla.1984); [1306]*1306§§ 775.087(1), 777.04(4)(b), 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (1981).

Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There is sufficient evidence on the record upon which the trier of fact could base its verdict. See Rodriguez v. State, 558 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Moreover, the trial court properly classified the defendant’s conviction as a first degree felony and correctly sentenced him as a habitual violent felony offender to a life term. See Miller v. State, 460 So.2d 373 (Fla.1984); [1306]*1306§§ 775.087(1), 777.04(4)(b), 782.04(2), Fla. Stat. (1981).

Accordingly, the defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Short v. State, 620 So. 2d 1305, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7620, 1993 WL 267526 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

620 So. 2d 1305 (Short v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related