Short v. State
135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 683
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of unlawfully possessing a still, and he appeals. ■
The record has been examined, and, no prejudicial error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Short v. State, 135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 683 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).
135 So. 926 (Short v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.