Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Short v. State

Short v. State

135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 683
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 16, 1931
Docket6 Div. 52.
StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 926 (Short v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Short v. State, 135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 683 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of unlawfully possessing a still, and he appeals. ■

The record has been examined, and, no prejudicial error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 926, 24 Ala. App. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/short-v-state-alactapp-1931.