Short v. State

101 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 695
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1924·No. 6 Div. 518.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The entire record has been read and considered by this court sitting en banc, and the unanimous conclusion is reached that evidence adduced upon this trial was wholly insufficient to support the verdict of the jury *696 and to sustain the judgment of conviction. The accused was entitled to the general affirmative charge requested in writing, and for the failure- to give this charge the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Short v. State, 101 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 695 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

101 So. 926 (Short v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.