Short v. Sparrow

96 N.C. 348
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Davis, J.,

(after stating the facts). This Court cannot ■.undertake to decide between conflicting affidavits, nor will it depart from its well established and published rule, not to recognize any agreement of counsel unless the same shall .appear in the record, or in writing filed in the cause. W e •cannot undertake to settle such disputed facts as are presented ■'in this case. But aside from this, the defendant does not point out any error sought to be appealed from, or show any .meritorious ground of appeal.

The application for the writ must be denied.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Short v. Sparrow, 96 N.C. 348 (N.C. 1887).

96 N.C. 348 (Short v. Sparrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of Banks
22 S.E.2d 896 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Pue v. Hood
222 N.C. 310 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Alabama Power Co. v. City of Fort Payne
187 So. 632 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
State v. . Butner
117 S.E. 163 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
State v. . Price
15 S.E. 116 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)