Short v. Pullen

38 S.W. 1113, 63 Ark. 385, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 117
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 23, 1897·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) The judgment is contrary to the law and evidence. Gregory v. Bewly, 9 Ark. 22; Baird v. Millwood, 51 Ark. 548; Vahlberg v. Keaton, id. 534; Scruggs v. Scottish Mortg. Co., 54 id. 572,; May v. Flint, 54 id. 578; Blackburn v. Hayes, 59 id. 366; Holt v. Kirby, 57 Ark. 256.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Short v. Pullen, 38 S.W. 1113, 63 Ark. 385, 1897 Ark. LEXIS 117 (Ark. 1897).

38 S.W. 1113 (Short v. Pullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rozen v. Redco Corporation
1961 OK 50 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1961)
Searl v. Earll
62 A.2d 374 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1948)
Citizens' Bank v. Heyward
133 S.E. 709 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)