Short v. Prime Care Medical

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 23, 2009
• Docket: 08-8317
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8317

HARVEY P. SHORT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PRIME CARE MEDICAL; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRED; DR CORDER, Psychiatrist; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BUSH; NURSE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TERRY; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BARRY; LIEUTENANT ROGERS; JOHN MCKAY, Jail Administrator; DAVID FARMER, Counselor Supervisor; LAVANA DAVIS-HARVEY, Counselor; SERGEANT THOMPSON; SERGEANT BINOIN; SERGEANT ATKINS; MARK BECK, Physician Assistant; SOUTH CENTRAL REGIONAL JAIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (2:06-cv-00933)

Submitted: March 17, 2009 Decided: March 23, 2009

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Dustin Dillard, John Dorsey Hoffman, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Chad Marlo Cardinal, Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia; Mark William Browning, David L. Shuman, Sr., SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY & SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

Short’s motion for reconsideration of the order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure

to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Short v. Prime Care

Medical, No. 2:06-cv-00933 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 17, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED