Home/Supreme Court/Short v. Ness Produce Co.

Short v. Ness Produce Co.

385 U.S. 537
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 23, 1967
Docket779, October Term, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 385 U.S. 537 (Short v. Ness Produce Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Short v. Ness Produce Co., 385 U.S. 537 (1967).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 2002
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 2002
Franssen v. Juras
406 F. Supp. 1375 (D. Oregon, 1975)
Bueno v. Juras
349 F. Supp. 91 (D. Oregon, 1972)
Velma L. Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission
442 F.2d 1119 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission
442 F.2d 1119 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
Sohappy v. Smith
302 F. Supp. 899 (D. Oregon, 1969)
Armour & Co. v. State
270 F. Supp. 941 (D. Nebraska, 1967)
Cunard SS Co. v. Lucci
228 A.2d 719 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 U.S. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/short-v-ness-produce-co-scotus-1967.