Short v. May
2 Sandf. 639
This text of 2 Sandf. 639 (Short v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Short v. May, 2 Sandf. 639 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1849).
Opinion
held that such a strict construction was not re[640]*640quisite. The statute established a general rule, which must be conformed to; but it did not deprive the court of a discretion to remedy the consequences of such an inadvertence. That the provision was in its nature directory. Plaintiff allowed to file the reply on the payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Sandf. 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/short-v-may-nysuperctnyc-1849.