Short v. Doe

Fourth Circuit

Short v. Doe

251 F. App'x 848

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2007·No. No. 07-7001·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[849]*849sons stated by the district court. Short v. Doe, No. 8:06-cv-02217-DKC (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea[849]*849sons stated by the district court. Short v. Doe, No. 8:06-cv-02217-DKC (D. Md. June 26, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Short v. Doe, 251 F. App'x 848 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

251 F. App'x 848 (Short v. Doe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related