Short v. Currier

23 N.E. 106, 150 Mass. 372, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 283
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 1, 1890·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

C. Allen, J,

The facts set forth in the bill, if proved, would estop the defendants from setting up any claim under their attachment, by reason of the conduct of Currier in standing by and seeing the plaintiff take the conveyance of the. premises under the impression that she was getting a clear title, and in advising and assisting her in so doing, and in making misrepresentations to her that it was irregular and not business-like to have the mortgages assigned, which conduct upon the facts set forth was with a design to mislead her, and- had that effect, and was clearly fraudulent.

Decree reversed, and demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Short v. Currier, 23 N.E. 106, 150 Mass. 372, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 283 (Mass. 1890).

23 N.E. 106 (Short v. Currier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Buccieri
40 Mass. App. Dec. 104 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1968)
Hinson v. Roof
122 S.E. 488 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1924)
Keyes v. Brackett
72 N.E. 986 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Baker v. Seavey
40 N.E. 863 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)