Short v. Charnock

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2007·No. 06-8025·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-8025

HARVEY P. SHORT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. CHARNOCK, Prosecutor; SUE C. RUBENSTEIN, Bar Admission Administrator; ROBERT SCHULENBURG, Assistant Prosecutor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00721)

Submitted: May 31, 2007 Decided: June 5, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey P. Short, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harvey P. Short appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

without prejudice Short’s civil action. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Short v. Charnock, No.

2:06-cv-00721 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Short v. Charnock, (4th Cir. 2007).

Short v. Charnock (Short v. Charnock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.