Short v. Bailey-Walker

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Short v. Bailey-Walker. Read the opinion of the Court — 393 F. App'x 980
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2010·No. 10-6559·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6559

HARVEY PATRICK SHORT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE JENNIFER BAILEY-WALKER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:09-cv-01096)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harvey Patrick Short, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harvey Patrick Short appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Short v. Bailey-Walker, No. 2:09-

cv-01096 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 2010). Short’s motions for an

order compelling the state court to adjudicate his state habeas

corpus petition and for an omnibus habeas corpus hearing are

denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Short v. Bailey-Walker, (4th Cir. 2010).

Short v. Bailey-Walker (Short v. Bailey-Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)