Shorell Laboratories, Inc. v. Lightman

29 A.D.2d 750, 288 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4670

Opinion

Order, entered on November 6, 1967, denying plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and dismissal of defendants’ second counterclaims, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of dismissing said counterclaims, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The “irrevocable” management agreements which form the basis of the counterclaims were not properly authorized by the plaintiff or its stockholders and appear to constitute an unlawful infringement on the powers and duties of the plaintiff’s board of directors. (See: Fells v. Katz, 256 N. Y. 67, 72.) Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McGivern and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shorell Laboratories, Inc. v. Lightman, 29 A.D.2d 750, 288 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

29 A.D.2d 750 (Shorell Laboratories, Inc. v. Lightman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fells v. Katz
175 N.E. 516 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)