Shore v. Smith
15 Ohio St. (N.S.) 173
Opinion
Held: A cause of action for slander, in charging the plaintiff with theft, may be united in the same petition with a cause of.action for a malicious prosecution for an alleged theft, both being for “ injuries to character” within the meaning of clause three of section eighty, of the Code of Civil Procedure. (S. & C’s Stat. 967-8). A man’s reputation may be destroyed or injured as effectually by preferring malicious indictments or prosecutions against him, as by spoken or written words. 3 Blac. Comm. 135.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shore v. Smith, 15 Ohio St. (N.S.) 173 (Ohio 1864).
15 Ohio St. (N.S.) 173 (Shore v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.